The Sofia city court has suspended all rights exercised in respect of the stock of Aroma, the publicly traded Bulgarian cosmetics maker.
As a result all Aroma shareholders will be unable to exercise rights related to the free trading of the stock, dividend payment and voting at general meetings, among others, said the company.
The court has ordered a stock injunction to secure a claim pending over the next month
Aroma said it received on July 23 and 29 notifications from two private enforcement agents regarding the court injunction.
'You don't need a legal degree to realise that this is a ridiculous and brash infringement of ownership rights,' said Lukan Lukanov, chairman of the Aroma supervisory board.
'A third party - in this case, the shareholders, cannot be made liable for future claims against the company. The only liable party is the company,' said Lukanov, noting that the company has over 600 shareholders at home and abroad.
The company official dismissed the development as an indication of a 'corruption scheme and practice'.
Future claimants are required to present to the court proof of the likely merits of their claim.
The court has the authority to require that the claimant provide guarantees against a frivolous claim and to set a term for the filing of the claim.
In the Aroma case, no guarantees have been requested. The claimant has one month to lodge his claim.
The claimant in this case is Krasimir Mitev, a former Lukanov business partner.
Mitev said his claims stem from a long-running dispute between the estranged business partners. He said he is in the process of having his rights as an Aroma shareholder restored in court.
The Central Depository, which will enforce the court ruling, declined to comment on Tuesday.
The bulletin of the Sofia stock exchange indicated that the Aroma stock was still trading on Tuesday.
A total of 1,162 shares changed hands on Tuesday with the stock slumping 18.49% to 2.20 levs per lot.
Experts said the legal option to enforce such a measure against the rights of all shareholders is a legislative flaw that should be fixed.(Dnevnik)
|